Hollyweird Liberal Actress Julianne Moore Doesn't Believe In God

USmagazine.com:

In therapy she trusts. Julianne Moore told The Hollywood Reporter in its new issue that she doesn't believe in God. Instead, she's placed her faith in her therapist and herself.

The Still Alice actress, 54, explained how she's developed her spiritual outlook, much of it stemming from her childhood. "The idea that you're the center of your own narrative and that you can create your life is a great idea," Moore told THR. "I totally believe it. I've been really lucky, but I feel I've completely created my own life."

It's this innate sense of personal control that's made Moore believe — at least in her personal life — the absence of a supreme higher power. "I learned when my mother died five years ago that there is no 'there' there," Moore told the mag. "Structure, it's all imposed. We impose order and narrative on everything in order to understand it. Otherwise, there's nothing but chaos."

Moore opened up about her mom Anne Smith's 2009 death at age 68 from septic shock. "We don't know why it happened," the actress revealed. "She went to bed, and it turned out she had a huge bacterial infection."

I've been saying for years that most social liberals are morally bankrupt because they don't believe God. As for this one, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who's followed her career and the kind of roles she takes on: ones mostly filled with debauchery including playing a lesbian at least twice. So stupid when people use tragedy as a reason not to believe in God, yeah keep listening to your therapist instead of the Word of the Lord you conceited nitwit.

RELATED: Why Does God Allow Tragedy and Suffering?

HBO’s Girls Sees Smallest Premiere on Record Despite Hype; Lena Dunham’s PR Disasters to Blame?

Mediaite.com:

In what some might think is the best news of the day: The numbers are now out for the much-hyped fourth season of HBO’s Girls… and they’re ugly.

In the lush timeslot that is Sunday at 9:00 p.m., the program drew just 680,000 viewers, which is down 40 percent from last year’s premiere (which also aired during the Golden Globes). In the key ages 18-49 demo, Girls raked in only 390,000 viewers, a drop of 35%. Context is everything, so it should be noted that the late Sex and the City averaged three million viewers in its fourth season. Needless to say, Sunday night’s viewership total was the lowest ever for a Girls‘ season premiere. 

Of course, its ubiquitous star, Lena Dunham — coming off of appearances last week on The Howard Stern Show to the Today Show (where Savannah Guthrie awkwardly offered up herself for a role on the show) to The Tonight Show — will likely find a way to blame Republicans/neocons/conservative white men for this ratings humiliation, as apparently the star is responsible for exactly nothing. 

Doesn’t matter which disturbing or debunked story you want to choose from, Dunham has turned off more than a few people who aren’t conservative or politically active or male, particularly with these accounts of her unsettling interactions with her younger sister growing up:

As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.

And:

I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. She was afraid to sleep alone and would begin asking me around 5:00 P.M. every day whether she could sleep with me. I put on a big show of saying no, taking pleasure in watching her beg and sulk, but eventually I always relented. Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night as I read Anne Sexton, watched reruns of SNL, sometimes even as I slipped my hand into my underwear to figure some stuff out.

Once those anecdotes set off some public fury, Dunham went underground for a bit after her own self-described rage spiral. But once you thought she would be out of the spotlight — at least until the media came running to promote her new season premiere — along came a past sexual assault allegation she shared in the same book that somehow makes Rolling Stone’s UVA frat house rape “exclusive” look like Pulitzer-winning material. 

If you recall, Dunham claims she got high on Xanax and cocaine one evening in college and decided to bring “the resident campus conservative” named Barry home. From there, she claims he assaulted her. A few problems arose, however, once several publications ranging from Breitbart to Gawker (later) decided to look more closely into her account. You probably know the rest by now: The story was so full of holes that Dunham’s own book publisher (Random House) was forced to alter future printings of the book while offering to pay for “Barry’s” legal expenses that he amassed while attempting to clear his name. 

The media, of course, still adores her. ESPN’s Bill Simmons — my favorite writer — interviewed her today for Grantland and declared Dunham was a victim of a “smear campaign” despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Pains me to say it but the Sports Guy embarrassed himself today, allowing his subject to say this about the allegations against her for fabricating the campus rape story:

“That article [from Breitbart, debunking her claims] came out on the day after I launched a Planned Parenthood campaign and the day before the midterm elections,” she explained, once again turning another topic into a partisan issue. “One thing I’ll never say about right-wing websites–they’re good at what they do.” Simmons didn’t bother to bring up Gawker or Random House or even remotely challenge her. Again, amateur interviewing from a big-time writer.

RELATED:  Lena Dunham: ‘I Don’t Care What Conservative White Men Think About Me’

Bisexual Hollyweirdo Actress Angelina Jolie’s Daughter is “Gender Assigned” at 8 Years Old

PJMedia.com:

According to Refinery 29, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s oldest biological child, Shiloh, has decided to identify as a male at the tender age of 8. The painfully politically correct story attempts to paint a picture of the child, who now refers to herself as “John” although born a girl, as gender-confused at an early age:

Jolie told Vanity Fair in a 2010 interview that John has been exploring their identity since the age of three. ”She wants to be a boy,” Jolie said. “So we had to cut her hair. She likes to wear boys’ everything. She thinks she’s one of the brothers.” 

Here’s the actual quote in context:

“She wants to be a boy. So we had to cut her hair. She likes to wear boys’ everything. She thinks she’s one of the brothers. Shiloh, we feel, has Montenegro style. She dresses like a little dude. It’s how people dress there. She likes tracksuits, she likes [regular] suits. Shiloh’s hysterically funny, one of the goofiest, most playful people you’ll ever meet. Goofy and verbal, the early signs of a performer. I used to get dressed up in costumes and jump around,” the actress explains.

tylists at the time balked at Jolie’s attempt to coin the term “Montenegro style” stating, “she was trying to say something intellectual or funny, and it just sounded dumb.” Probably about as dumb as the Advocate grasping at straws via the stale tale of Shiloh Pitt, who apparently has been dressed in boyswear and given boyishly short haircuts by her parents since she was a toddler. Four years later, why wouldn’t an 8-year-old girl think she ought to be called “John”? If anything she’s aiming for a more defined gender identity than her parents have yet to give her, either through her name, her hair, or her clothing, let alone the gender-neutral pronouns being used to identify her in the media. As the Advocate explains:

Editor’s note: This article uses “they” as a gender-neutral, singular pronoun in an effort to respect the young Jolie-Pitt’s gender identity, whatever that may end up being. 

Children begin to develop a sense of gender roles mere months into life. Politically correct culture, largely influenced by contemporary feminism, instructs that gender roles are strictly the stuff of stereotypes. However, family and parenting influences, not cultural stereotypes, have the greatest impact in a child’s understanding of gender roles:

…gender role behaviors, in­cluding the toys children play with and activities, in which they engage, are in­fluenced by how youngsters are raised and what expectations are made of them. …Perhaps more than any other factor, the subtleties of every child’s relationship with his or her father and mother—and the attitudes of the parents toward each other and toward the child—will influence his or her gender-related behaviors.

For girls like Shiloh who express the desire to be a boy and prefer to be around other boys instead of girls:

These traits suggest a conflict or confusion about gender and relationship with peers of the same sex. The possible causes of these variations are spec­ulative and controversial. Research demonstrates a role for both biological factors and social learning in gender-identity confusion. Family and parenting influences also might contribute to gender confusion.

What pop culture presents as quick and easy evidence to demonstrate their trendy social theories regarding gender and stereotyping is really an example of incredibly poor parenting that leaves a young child in desperate need of structure confused about themselves and their role in the world.

But who’s going to have the guts to say Brangelina are bad parents?

RELATED:  Angelina Jolie’s daughter is “gender assigned” at 8 years old

Hollyweird Liberal Lena Dunham Comes Out As A Child Molester

TruthRevolt.com:

On Saturday, HBO’s Lena Dunham sent a “cease and desist” letter to TruthRevolt demanding that we remove an article we posted last Wednesday on sections of her book, Not That Kind of Girl. The letter threatened legal action if we did not both remove that article, as well as print a note, the suggested language of which read as follows:

We recently published a story stating that Ms. Dunham engaged in sexual conduct with her sister.  The story was false, and we deeply regret having printed it.  We apologize to Ms. Dunham, her sister, and their parents, for this false story.

We refuse. We refuse to withdraw our story or apologize for running it, because quoting a woman’s book does not constitute a “false” story, even if she is a prominent actress and left-wing activist. Lena Dunham may not like our interpretation of her book, but unfortunately for her and her attorneys, she wrote that book – and the First Amendment covers a good deal of material she may not like.

In particular, the letter from Ms. Dunham’s lawyers labeled as “false and defamatory” our claims that she “experiment[ed] sexually with her younger sister Grace,” “experimented with her six-year younger sister’s vagina,” and “use[d] her little sister at times essentially as a sexual outlet.” In her desire to curb First Amendment freedoms, Dunham’s attorneys threatened legal action seeking “millions of dollars; punitive damages which can be a multiple of up to ten times actual damages; and injunctive relief.”

We assume that both Ms. Dunham and her attorneys are capable of reading Ms. Dunham’s book, which contains the following direct excerpts:

“Do we all have uteruses?” I asked my mother when I was seven.

“Yes,” she told me. “We’re born with them, and with all our eggs, but they start out very small. And they aren’t ready to make babies until we’re older.”

I looked at my sister, now a slim, tough one-year-old, and at her tiny belly. I imagined her eggs inside her, like the sack of spider eggs in Charlotte’s Web, and her uterus, the size of a thimble.
“Does her vagina look like mine?”

“I guess so,” my mother said. “Just smaller.”

One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist, and when I saw what was inside I shrieked. “My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”

My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things that I did. She just got on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been such a success.

And this:

As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.

And this:

I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. She was afraid to sleep alone and would begin asking me around 5:00 P.M. every day whether she could sleep with me. I put on a big show of saying no, taking pleasure in watching her beg and sulk, but eventually I always relented. Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night as I read Anne Sexton, watched reruns of SNL, sometimes even as I slipped my hand into my underwear to figure some stuff out.

If Ms. Dunham says that our quotations from her book were “false,” or that our interpretation of those events was libelous under the law, then we look forward to asking her, in her deposition, about why they appeared in her book. We also look forward to asking her why she believes it is now appropriate for a 28-year-old woman to make light of opening her baby sister’s vagina, paying her with candies for prolonged kisses on the lips in the manner of a “sexual predator,” or masturbating in bed next to her prepubescent sister.

If Ms. Dunham says that our quotations from her book were “false,” then she should explain whether her statements in which she accused a young college Republican of rape were also false. We look forward to asking her about that in her deposition as well, given that she has reportedly refused to cooperate with Oberlin police to track down the alleged perpetrator, which leaves other young women at risk if her accusations are true.

It is worth noting that Truth Revolt was far from the only outlet to point out these troubling sections in Ms. Dunham’s book. National Review’s Kevin Williamson wrote of “Lena Dunham’s sexual abuse, specifically, of her younger sister, Grace” – the article that first alerted us to Ms. Dunham’s disturbing writings. The Daily Caller’s Derek Hunter has written of Ms. Dunham’s “gleeful sexual abuse of her infant sister, Grace.”

After Truth Revolt’s report on Ms. Dunham’s book, Ms. Dunham took to Twitter with what she termed a “rage spiral,” terming accusations that “I molested my little sister isn’t just LOL – it’s really fucking upsetting and disgusting.” She added, “And by the way, if you were a little kid and never looked at another little kid’s vagina, well, congrats to you.” No, congrats to you, Ms. Dunham – you’ve managed to lead a life so free of criticism that you find it “upsetting and disgusting” when some folks are offended that you “carefully spread open” your baby sister’s vagina, or paid her to kiss you on the mouth in the manner of a “sexual predator,” or masturbated in bed next to her as a teenager. In the real world, folks find such behavior upsetting and disgusting, not reporting on such behavior.

Bullies like Ms. Dunham may believe that firing off legal threats against those who exercise First Amendment rights is perfectly legitimate. But for a woman who proclaims to be an advocate for freedom of speech to attempt to shut down such speech based on her own apparent embarrassment at her own disclosures in her own book demonstrates the totalitarianism of those on the left – and those in the legal and media establishment who enable them.

RELATED: Concha: Lena Dunham’s Disturbing Passage Deserves All the Scorn It’s Getting

Uber Rich Man Leonardo DiCaprio With Yachts and Planes Lectures World About Global Warming

Townhall.com:

Actor Leonardo DiCaprio is a very rich man. His net worth sits at $220 million, which naturally means he owns many expensive things that require a lot of oil to enjoy. For example, here he is on his yacht.

Over the weekend, a march to stop climate change was held in New York City. DiCaprio took the time to leave his multi-million dollar Manhattan apartment and walked in solidarity with the crowd full of hipsters wearing their petroleum based shoes. He took selfies with marchers on their earth destroying iPhones. 

Luckily, the United Nations held a Climate Change Summit this week and DiCaprio was given a speaking slot. He is also a newly minted UN "messenger of peace." DiCaprio took advantage of the opportunity by lecturing the rest of the world about how to use less energy (through government force of course because changing individual, personal choices when it comes to energy consumption is just too hard apparently). 

When he was finished at the podium, there's no doubt DiCaprio left the stage to get into an SUV, which of course took him back to his private jet so he could start his next yachting vacation. 

"As an actor I pretend for a living. I play fictitious characters often solving fictitious problems," DiCaprio said in a suit that cost thousands of dollars. "I stand before you not as an expert, but as a concerned citizen, one of the 400,000 people who marched in the streets of New York on Sunday and the billions of others around the world who want to solve our climate crisis." 

Yes, DiCaprio is a concerned citizen just like the rest of us... 

"To be clear, this is not about just telling people to change their light bulbs or to buy a hybrid car, this disaster has grown beyond the choices that individuals make. This is now about our industries and our governments around the world taking decisive and large scale action," he continued. "This isn't hysteria. This is fact." 

As always with these people, less energy for thee but not for me. If DiCaprio wants really change, he should start with himself and lead by example. That isn't hysteria, it's a fact. 

RELATED:  Critics Slam Climate Change Protesters for Leaving Trash at NYC March

White Liberal Hero Laverne Cox Campaigns To Transfer Transsexual Child Killer To Women's Prison

When racist, liberal mainstream magazines like People gush on how "pretty" male drag queen Laverne Cox is, remember this act of blatant ignorance:

LSA and black twitter's favorite mutilated dude in a dress, has launched a campaign for child rapist and killer, "Synthia" China Blast, aka Luis Morales.
Luis Morales, the transperson Laverne Cox wants us to have sympathy for and to be transferred to a woman's facility, is incarcerated for the rape, murder, and abuse of the corpse of a 13 year old black girl named Ebony Williams.

Quote:

Out of all the causes in the entire world that could have been championed, the OITNB star Laverne Cox asks that you lend your support to a deranged, sadistic, life-extinguishing person who raped and murdered little Ebony Nicole Williams, then dumped her lifeless body off a highway underpass, later returning to burn her corpse. Cox is joined in this action by the Sylvia Rivera Law Project, a transgender organization that supports incarcerated males who are serving sentences for the rape, murder, and sexual exploitation of children. The organization encourages transgender youth to write to these men, including pedophile Lewis Stevens who represents the Sylvia Rivera Law Project as “Lennea Elizabeth Stevens” in a blog on their website. Stevens is incarcerated for possessing a collection of videos of children being raped. See a partial list of his collection here:

http://gendertrender.wordpress.com/2...iams/#comments
You can click on the link and read the descriptions of the sick child pornography. I won't post them here. But there is a strong idea in the trans movement that child sex abuse is not wrong. That it's no big deal. Even Janet Mock said his being a child prostitute helped him "feel like a girl". Y'all better wake up.
All this to say, this is the MAINSTREAM trans movment, people. Laverne Cox and The Sylvia Rivera Law Project are MAINSTREAM. Janet Mock "child prostitution is empowering" is MAINSTREAM. When you support this phony movement, this is what you are supporting. These people are sick. Does no one care for young Ebony Williams and what this man did to her? She was brutally raped and murdered and then set on fire, but Laverne think poor Luis is a victim cause they won't let him in the women's prison?!! So it's transphobic to not want this violent child killer in a prison with women?
You people better wake up. They don't care about women, they don't care about children. The trans movement is a "men's rights" movement. They are sick and they condone violence against women and children. Their precious man feelings come before our safety.

RELATED:  Cuomo Calls To Outlaw Transgender Discrimination

Godless Hollywood Weirdo Actress Anna Paquin Wants To Make Bisexuality The New Norm

CBSNews.com:

Anna Paquin set Larry King straight when he asked about her bisexuality during a recent interview.

The actress, who is married to her "True Blood" co-star Stephen Moyer, faced questions about her sexuality from the 80-year-old interviewer during an appearance on his show "Larry King Now."

"Are you a non-practicing bisexual?" he asked Paquin.

"Well, I mean, I am married to my husband, and we are happy monogamously married," the 32-year-old replied.

"But you were bisexual?" King continued, prompting Paquin to clarify things further.

"Well, I don't think it's a past tense thing," she explained. "Are you still straight if you are with somebody?... If you were to break up with them or if they were to die, it doesn't prevent your sexuality from existing. It doesn't really work like that."

Paquin came out as bisexual in 2010. She and Moyer married that same year and welcomed twins in 2012. "True Blood" is currently airing its final season on HBO.

RELATED:  Anna Paquin’s Bisexuality for Dummies

Tyrant Liberal Alec Baldwin's Daughter Ireland Is A Lesbian Dating A "Butch" Black Rapper

Thanks to the Gay Mafia and Godless, white liberals giving their stamp of approval, homosexuality has not only become normalized, but an easy choice for uneducated, young, naive souls who grew up in a toxic environment. Ireland Baldwin, famous for not only being the daughter of Kim Basinger and Alec Baldwin, but also for modeling and for famous dad calling her a 'pig' on a voicemail when she was younger, is now just another victim of Hollyweirdo parents as well as a calling she'll probably never understand:

The interview starts off talking about Kanye West due to the fact that Angel Haze is supporting him at Wireless later this year. "To be on the same stage as one of my favourite artists is just insane. I admire his honesty, his brashness may be hard for some people to deal with, but it's always real and it comes from a place that you know he's completely passionate about. It's inspiring to see someone who is true to who they are."

After this, the interview explores her relationship with Ireland Baldwin. Angel has been dating the model daughter of Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger for four months, and even though Angel describes herself as 'pansexual', telling the paper, "Love isn't defined by gender", it sounds like the relationship is going from strength to strength.

"It's going well … We met during New York Fashion Week - I knew her cousin really well. We ended up hanging out and becoming friends for a few months, then…"

The loved-up pictures tell us all we need to know...

Angel also goes on to describe how the media portray their relationship: "I don't know if there's like some confirm or deny thing with the way relationships work in the media, but everyone just calls us best friends, best friends for life, like we're just friends hanging out.

"It's funny. It's rad in some ways, it sucks in others.

"We f**k and friends don't f**k. I have never f**ked one of my friends. Once I see you in that way, it doesn't happen."

RELATED: Federal appeals court strikes down Utah’s gay-marriage ban

Actor Gary Oldman Goes Off on PC ‘Crap,’ Liberal Double Standards in Hollywood

When conservative actors (who rarely have the guts to "come out" for fear of being blacklisted by the Gay Mafia that runs Hollyweird) speak openly it's funny how a resident liberal journalist will refer their words as "rants":

Actor Gary Oldman is more conservative, politically speaking, than most other people in Hollywood, and in a new interview with Playboy, he goes off on the political correctness that torpedoed both Mel Gibson and Alec Baldwin‘s careers, as well as the liberal double standard in Hollywood over who gets to make jokes about whom.

When asked to weigh in on what Gibson’s dealt with over the years, Oldman said, “I just think political correctness is crap. That’s what I think about it. I think it’s like, take a fucking joke. Get over it.” He said so many “fucking hypocrites” condemned Gibson, but they privately use words like he did.

Oldman also didn’t begrudge Alec Baldwin for using the word “fag” against a paparazzo after his family had been harassed by people with cameras. But because of that one word, he said, Baldwin’s been made into “an outcast, a leper.”

Oldman also went on a bit of a rant about how certain people in Hollywood are allowed to get away with politically incorrect jokes but people like him really can’t:

“Well, if I called Nancy Pelosi a cunt—and I’ll go one better, a fucking useless cunt—I can’t really say that. But Bill Maher and Jon Stewart can, and nobody’s going to stop them from working because of it. Bill Maher could call someone a fag and get away with it. He said to Seth MacFarlane this year, ‘I thought you were going to do the Oscars again. Instead they got a lesbian.’ He can say something like that. Is that more or less offensive than Alec Baldwin saying to someone in the street, ‘You fag’? I don’t get it.”

He also found it ridiculous that the culture in Hollywood last Oscar season was “if you didn’t vote for 12 Years a Slave you were a racist.”

RELATED:  James Woods blasts ‘Obama’s IRS thugs,’ NY Times lapdogs, presidential crickets